Penetration testing: what an attacker would actually do.
The goal is not to produce a list of theoretical vulnerabilities — it's to show what a real attacker could do, how far they could go, and what it would actually cost.
Four main perimeters
Web
Injections, authentication bypass, session theft, sensitive-data exposure. Manual approach, OWASP-based.
- OWASP Top 10
- Authenticated multi-role testing
- API fuzzing · GraphQL
- Business logic
Infrastructure / internal network
Simulating an attacker with a foothold. Attack paths, privilege escalations, misconfigurations.
- Access control · NAC
- Lateral movement
- Privilege escalation
- Data exfiltration
Mobile
Analysis of the application, its API communications, and on-device behaviour. Based on OWASP Mobile.
- Reverse · decompilation
- Local storage
- API communication
- SSL-pin bypass
Active Directory
Audit of AD configuration, identification of attack paths to top privileges, exploitation of bad authentication and delegation practices.
- Kerberoasting · ASREP
- Constrained delegation
- ACL abuses
- Tier 0 · Domain Admin
Five steps
Scoping
Technical workshop: scope, scenarios, constraints, exploitation window, emergency contacts.
Kickoff
Presentation of methodology, tools, team. Final validation of scope and requirements.
Execution
Recon, vulnerability identification, exploitation, post-exploitation. Daily updates.
Debrief
Detailed technical report + prioritised remediation plan. Presentation to technical teams and decision-makers.
Re-test (optional)
Validation of applied fixes, finding updates, remediation attestation.
A readable report. A prioritised action plan.
Our report is built to be used: by technical teams to fix, by decision-makers to prioritise.
Ensure peace.
Prepare for war.
A partner replies within 48 hours for an initial technical exchange.